NO PRIOR SANCTION NEEDED! ⚖️ Supreme Court on FIR under Section 156(3) CrPC

S

Sajjad Husain

Author
30/04/2026
1 मिनट पढ़ें
NO PRIOR SANCTION NEEDED! ⚖️ Supreme Court on FIR under Section 156(3) CrPC
लेख साझा करें

Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay v. Union of India & Ors. — W.P.(C) No. 943 of 2021 & 20+ connected matters, decided by a two-judge bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta on 29 April 2026.

Key highlights included in the summary:

  1. Background — 13 writ petitions seeking hate speech legislation + Law Commission Report No. 267 context
  2. Five Issues — judicially framed questions on legislative power of courts, legislative vacuum, FIR remedies, continuing mandamus, and the sanction question
  3. Full Analysis — covering all four parts of the judgment including the Constitution Bench-style discussion on fraternity and vasudhaiva kutumbakam
  4. Holdings — colour-coded (Dismissed / Partly Allowed / Closed / Pending) with the 19 May 2026 listing date for pending contempt matters
  5. 8 Key Legal Principles — distilled for quick practitioner reference
  6. Principal Cases ReferredLalita Kumari, Sakiri Vasu, Pastor P. Raju, and others
  7. The critical sanction ruling — that Section 156(3) CrPC is a pre-cognizance exercise, so prior sanction under Sections 196/197 CrPC is not required before directing FIR registration

Sajjad Husain Advocate High Court Lucknow UP India E-Mail ID sajjadhusainlawasociates@gmail.com WhatsApp & Calling Number 7080909786


Find PDF Judgement

https://t.me/sajjadhusainlaw/301





S

Sajjad Husain

Advocate

sajjadhusainlawassociates@gmail.com

संबंधित लेख